http://www.blogger.com/template-edit.g?blogID=5698442&saved=true <i>Other Music from a...</i> Different Kitchen <$BlogRSDUrl$>

Friday, April 30, 2004

The mainstream media drops the ball yet again.... 

I haven't been keeping up with the news much in the last few days so these links/stories may be a day or so out of date but here's something to consider: why am I getting a fuller picture of what's poppin' in Iraq from New York's free daily paper amNewYork than from any of the "mainstream" media sources? WTF?



First off, I love how the New York Post gets down (wrt the cover story above):
In a stunning snub, two Democrats on the 9/11 commission yesterday abruptly walked out in the middle of the Oval Office interview with President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.
Both early-departing panelists, former Nebraska Sen. Bob Kerrey and ex-Indiana Rep. Lee Hamilton, insisted they had prior commitments - but their sudden slip out the side door of the White House left Washington and some fellow commission members in shock. (full story)
While even I have to admit that's it's tough to imagine any other commitment that could take precendence over sitting in on testimony from the president and vice president, I watched coverage of this story on CNN yesterday and apparently both Kerrey and Hamilton had advised the White House in advance that they would have to bow out if the session ran longer than two hours.

Meanwhile, even as he testified yesterday, Bush is still cock blockin' getting to the truth behind the intelligence failure that led to 9/11: Lawyers try to gag FBI worker over 9/11. (Independent UK)

And we're still trying to spend money on missile defense in 2004?! Not sure how a high-tech missile defense system would have helped stopped those planes two and a half years ago or help our soldiers as they get blasted in urban guerilla warfare with unidentifiable insurgents in Fallujah.
Whether or not North Korea has nukes or not, the US will be safe from them by the end of the year, Air Force Lt. Gen. Ron Kadish, director of the "Star Wars" Missile Defense Agency said yesterday [April 28]. But critics claim the multi-million dollar program is an overpriced waste.

Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.), a member of the Armed Services Committee, has called the missile tests "shamefully rigged" and said the money [a $1.12 billion budget overrun in 2003] could be better spent sending another 10,000 troops to Iraq.
from "Star Wars redux: This time it 'works'" by Chuck Bennett. (amNewYork 4/28/04) I love the irony of how during the Coild War when no actual fighting was done by the US Armed Forces (remember all the conflicts with the Communists were fought via proxy in Latin America, Africa etc.), military budgets went through the roof. But now that the US is actually engaged in a full scale, two-front conflict (f-ck it, war), they can't even get enough troops, armor or appropriate vehicles to protect themselves. WTF? BTW, how's this for lack of mainstream media coverage on the Missile Defense story: only 5 results come up when you google Ron Kadis' name. Why isn't anyone covering this??

And how's this for Irony?
L. Paul Bremer, the U.S. administrator in Iraq, said in a speech six months before the September 11, 2001 attacks that the Bush administration was "paying no attention" to terrorism.

"What they will do is stagger along until there's a major incident and then suddenly say, 'Oh my God, shouldn't we be organized to deal with this,"' said Bremer at McCormick Tribune Foundation conference on terrorism on February 26, 2001. (full story)
from "Bremer criticized Bush on terrorism before attacks." (CNN.com)

Consider this stat from "April is Iraq's deadliest month" in USA Today:
By mid-April, it was already the deadliest month for U.S. troops in Iraq. By Thursday, the month's death toll had climbed to 134, more than the number of troops killed in the war's opening stages, from the invasion to the toppling of Saddam Hussein's statue in Baghdad. (full story)
And these losers couldn't even get changing the flag right. That f-ck-up just about epitomizes how this whole Iraq situation has been mis-handled: no pre-planning and inept execution from the get including the decision to even engage in this war. Why did we need to change the flag anyway? Aren't there more important things to deal with over there, like actually securing and maintaining the peace across the entire country that we're planning on handing back in just about 8 weeks! (Center for American Progress)

And on that note:
Iraqi's will have a "lot more sovereignty than they have right now" after the June 30 handover, but the US will still control security and the caretaker government won't be able to make laws says John D. Negroponte. They will [however] carry out the government's day-to-day operation [and] focus on organizing elections
from "US will limit new Iraq gov't." (amNewYork 4/28/04) So what eactly is being handed over on June 30?

But speaking of inept: Bush is actually releasing the terrorists from Gitmo as covered in Michael Isikoff's "Guantanamo: The 'Revolving Door' Sends Terrorists Back Out." (Newsweek)

And from "Iraq and Terror: Follow the Money" in this week's Newsweek:
After 9/11, Congress gave the Bush administration $40 billion worth of emergency antiterror funding. The money was supposed to finance post-attack cleanup, the global hunt for terrorists and improvements in homeland security. The funding bills instructed the administration to "consult" Congress about specific projects on which the money would be spent. But following allegations by author Bob Woodward that the administration diverted funds from the antiterror war to make secret preparations for war in Iraq, Democrats accused the administration of ignoring the legal requirement to keep legislators informed. Sen. Robert Byrd, top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, charged the "Bush White House provided no consultations as required by law." (full story)
Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia's foreign minister has complained that criticism in the US is harming Saudi efforts to fight terror. (full story BBC World News) Erm, actually I think the fact that your corrupt Royal Family and government (which are basically one and the same organization) funds and appeases terrorist organizations, via money laundering "charities" and fundamentalist indoctrination/terrorist recruitment centers masquerading as "schools", is doing more harm than any soft-peddled US media coverage.

Karen Hughes is out of her mind equating pro-choicers with terrorists, WTF?:
"I think after September 11th the American people are valuing life more and realizing that we need policies to value the dignity and worth of every life. And President Bush has worked to say, let's be reasonable, let's work to value life, let's try to reduce the number of abortions, let's increase adoptions."

"The fundamental difference between us and the terror network we fight is that we value every life. It's the founding conviction of our country, that we're endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights, the right to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

"Unfortunately our enemies in the terror network, as we're seeing repeatedly in the headlines these days, don't value any life, not even the innocent and not even their own..." (full transcript from CNN.com)
Related:
- Hughes rapped over abortion comments. (CNN.com)

And one more reason to fire Bush in November. (via Anousheh)

Meanwhile Kerry still doesn't seem to be inspiring the rank and file on the left (but don't get it twisted like James Ridgeway, Howard Dean was not the answer.) (Village Voice via Bol from byroncrawford.com)

But to end on a lighter note: math majors or numbers whizzes, who can tell me how this works?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button